playing wiki media-Community with the idea of ending crypto donations as well. Like Mozilla in the past, Wikimedia trusts the service provider here. bitpayto be able to accept cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), and Ethereum (ETH) as donations. However, by doing so, the respective token is converted into fiat money before it reaches the organization’s account.
The Meta-Wiki, a Wikimedia forum used to discuss new proposals, hosts related discourse.
Life cycle assessment and the “cryptographic image”
Contrasting with the course, you don’t want to see skyrocketing numbers when it comes to ecological balance. But it is precisely this issue that some panelists raise. However, arguments range from “the environmental impact of a bitcoin transaction” to “bitcoin is an incentive for green energy.” So while some lament the potential environmental impact of cryptocurrencies, others argue that payment alternatives, well PayPal, credit cards and Co.- could even consume more energy.
We at BTC-ECHO have also addressed the topic of Bitcoin in relation to our environment in our crypto compass.
While environmental impact is by far the most debated topic in the Wikimedia debate, other arguments found their way as well. The user who called for the crypto donations to be stopped wrote that they could damage Wikimedia’s reputation. Because even open source projects like Mozilla eventually he had concerns.
“Many people can benefit from the discussion”
Although the votes of the Wikimedia community carry weight, this is still not the only criterion for decision making. Rather, the quality of the various arguments is considered decisive.
Ultimately, however, this is valuable cryptographic discourse that would not have been possible without Wikimedia. Rene Pickhardt, Bitcoin Lightning specialist and active Wikimedia member, explained his point of view not only on the meta wiki, but also on BTC-ECHO:
The proposal and reflections have already led to more than 200 people contributed to the discussion with a total of more than 500 contributions to the discussion and he presented and partially refuted a large number of arguments. I’m delighted that the Wikipedia community is discussing this topic with such intensity and I believe that many people can benefit from the discussion to form their own differentiated opinion. I’m excited to see what the community will ultimately decide.
Rene Pickhardt to BTC-ECHO
Pickhardt drew attention through a cheep on the Wikimedia discussion. He personally linked the president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele. The Lightning specialist is primarily concerned with the effects on the Central American country. Because this has introduced Bitcoin (BTC) as legal tender.
“At the time of my tweet, I hadn’t seen that Bitcoin being legal tender in El Salvador had found room in the discussion,” Pickhardt told BTC-ECHO. “However, I think this fact should play a role in deciding and weighing the arguments, because I think Wikipedia sees itself as a global and inclusive movement,” says the Lightning specialist. “Basically, I find it exciting how many effects, not just in the context of the Wikimedia debate, the new legislation has in El Salvador.”
Because that’s what Wikimedia and other open source projects are all about. Crypto donations or not: the resulting crypto discourse, which may bring the subject closer to many people, is ultimately priceless.
Do you want to buy Cardano (ADA)?
We show you the best providers where you can buy and sell Cardano in a few minutes.
to the advisor